Committee for plundered ministers

The history of Belchamp Walter at the time preceeding the English Civil War, the reign of James I and the marriage of a Raymond to a Harris, could be connected to the formulation of the Committee for plundered ministers.
Cromwellian Protectorate
One of the key concerns of the successive godly regimes that held power in England between 1642 and 1660 was to
improve the moral and religious standards of the elect chosen nation they believed divine Providence
had entrusted to their care. The nine thousand or so parochial ministers who were responsible for providing
the day-to-day pastoral support for the population were perceived as a critical resource in this task,
and strenuous efforts were made to ensure that they were both up to the task of moral reformation and religiously
and politically ‘on message’. From the early 1640s onwards, a series of local investigations and purges was
initiated, with the aim of removing from their cures all those who were considered either pastorally deficient or
ideologically unsound, and replacing them with more acceptable men. While this campaign was intense in places,
it was also somewhat uncoordinated and sporadic. In December 1642 the Long Parliament established a
‘committee for plundered ministers’ and entrusted it with the task of removing from the ministry all those
who displayed Laudian or royalist sympathies. It subsequently bolstered this initiative by issuing additional
specific commissions to local military commanders and parliamentary committeemen, such as Sir Thomas Fairfax in
Yorkshire, Sir William Brereton in Cheshire, John Pyne in Somerset, and Thomas Cooke in Essex. These and other
individuals pursued their local purges with enthusiasm, but the same commitment was not shown in all areas.
In some parts of the country, either through the preoccupation or inefficiency of the local parliamentary
authorities or the protection they received from powerful local patrons, numbers of suspect ministers remained
in post. Thus, while overall somewhat over 20 per cent of the English clergy lost their livings during the course
of the 1640s, the scale of ejections varied considerably across the country. The areas that saw the highest
proportion were Kent, East Anglia, the east Midlands and the north-west, while in the west Midlands,
the Severn valley and the southern Pennine region the level was below average. The highest rate of all
occurred in London, where 36 per cent of ministers lost their positions.
Although by the early 1650s several thousand ministers had already been removed from the ministry, some of those
in and around the new republican regime believed that a great many more ejections were needed if the work of moral
regeneration was to achieve real and lasting results.